Home
Repository Search
Listing
Academics - Research coordination office
R-RC -Acad
Admin-Research Repository
Engineering and Computer Science
Computer Science
Engineering
Mathematics
Languages
Arabic
Chinese
English
French
Persian
Urdu
German
Korean
Management Sciences
Economics
Governance and Public Policy
Management Sciences
Management Sciences Rawalpindi Campus
ORIC
Oric-Research
Social Sciences
Education
International Relations
Islamic thought & Culture
Media and Communication Studies
Pakistan Studies
Peace and Conflict Studies
Psychology
Content Details
Back to Department Listing
Title
UNIVERSITY STAKEHOLDERS’ PERCEPTION ABOUT EFFECTIVENESS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PRACTICES WITH REFERENCE TO ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE
Author(s)
Zahida Abdullah
Abstract
Ratees’ reactions to appraisal practices and their perceptions of appraisal system fairness may happen to be a good indicator of appraisal system success. The primary intent of this research was to investigate employees’ perception of performance appraisal (PA) aspects in connection with organizational justice (i.e., distributive, procedural, informational justice, and interpersonal justice to check its effect on Performance Appraisal effectiveness and employees’ satisfaction with appraisal system in higher education institutes of Pakistan. The conceptual framework was based on Greenberg's (1993) four-factor model. This study's research design was explanatory using mix method approach. The study population was teaching faculty N= 1237 of public and private sector universities of Quetta. Stratified sampling technique was used and the sample size of the current study was n= 532. I used Thruston (2001) scale used by Walsh (2003) in her study. The questionnaire was validated by field experts and scale reliability was (.908). Result exhibited a positive relationship between distributive justice, informational justice, and interpersonal justice with appraisal effectiveness while exhibiting a non-significant relationship between procedural justice and PA effectiveness. Study results also reported a positive relationship between distributive justice, procedural justice, and informational justice with employees’ satisfaction with PA system and a non-significant relationship between employees’ satisfaction with PA and interpersonal justice in performance appraisal. Further confidentiality of ACR proforma and ACR comments, non-equality of rules for all, no connection of promotion with performance, lack of teacher participation and training, political baking and relationships, lack of communication, and no feedback mechanism were top-rated factors causing dissatisfaction among employees. It was recommended to work on methods of increasing the PA system's effectiveness and making it acceptable for the employees with their satisfaction.
Type
Thesis/Dissertation PhD
Faculty
Social Sciences
Department
Education
Language
English
Publication Date
2023-03-28
Subject
Publisher
Contributor(s)
Format
Identifier
Source
Relation
Coverage
Rights
Category
Description
Performance appraisal is considered as a basic HRM component because it benefits organizations through its application. Performance appraisal may enhance employees' job performance in organizations but still workers detest this process due to its ineffectiveness. Moreover, performance appraisal fairness insight has put the researchers in dilemma. Organizational justice refers to the fairness of the workplace and includes four distinct factors: distributive justice, procedural justice, interpersonal justice, and informational justice.
Attachment
Name
Timestamp
Action
e1da262dca.pdf
2023-06-01 12:01:18
Download