Home
Repository Search
Listing
Academics - Research coordination office
R-RC -Acad
Admin-Research Repository
Engineering and Computer Science
Computer Science
Engineering
Mathematics
Languages
Arabic
Chinese
English
French
Persian
Urdu
German
Korean
Management Sciences
Economics
Governance and Public Policy
Management Sciences
Management Sciences Rawalpindi Campus
ORIC
Oric-Research
Social Sciences
Education
International Relations
Islamic thought & Culture
Media and Communication Studies
Pakistan Studies
Peace and Conflict Studies
Psychology
Content Details
Back to Department Listing
Title
Comparative Study of Psycholinguistic Devices Used by Victorian Authors
Author(s)
Muhammad Ayub
Abstract
A critical debate exists among the discourse analysts in context of the supremacy of spoken discourses on written discourse, and vice versa. The proponents of these two schools have denigrating arguments about each discourse. The present study endeavors to prove how written discourses follow the principles of the spoken channels and how do the literary authors demonstrate such canons in their literary productions. Moreover, the present study discusses that how do literary writers cope with the changing mental scenarios of the fictional characters through observing a change in language of these characters. In this research work, the researcher carries out the psycholinguistic analysis of three Victorian novels to evaluate the effects of trauma on the employed language of the characters of the selected novels. In the present study, the researcher codes the texts of three Victorian novelists: Charles Dickens, George Eliot and Thomas Hardy in different phases of their characters‘ fictional lives and compares how the selected writers are different and similar in depicting the effects of the psychological stimuli on language production of these characters. In the present study, the researcher analyzes the text samples of the selected characters to evaluate the effects of trauma on language of the selected characters and their depiction through phonological, lexical, morphological and orthographic devices.
Type
Thesis/Dissertation PhD
Faculty
Languages
Department
English
Language
English
Publication Date
2015-01-01
Subject
Publisher
Contributor(s)
Format
Identifier
Source
Relation
Coverage
Rights
Category
Description
Attachment
Name
Timestamp
Action
80078e3161.pdf
2018-10-12 16:04:59
Download